The speed is the machine's.
The responsibility is ours.

It's the service where the machine translates first and a human linguist corrects afterwards, up to human-translation quality in the full version. It combines the speed and cost of machine translation with the accountability of a professional, and it has its own standard: ISO 18587, which we're certified in.

When the volume is large, the deadline is short and the content has a repetitive structure: technical documentation, support content, listings, internal material. For creative or legally high-risk content, human translation still wins; we'll tell you which one pays off, case by case.

You can, with two risks: whatever you paste into public engines leaves your control (confidentiality and GDPR), and nobody answers for the terminology mistakes AI makes with total confidence. We use private engines trained with your glossaries and put a specialist's name behind the result.

Yes: we never use public engines. Your content runs in a private environment, under NDA and GDPR, with data residency on request. What the machine learns from you never leaves you.

It requires post-editing to be done by qualified linguists, with a defined process and a result equivalent to human translation, and auditable. It's the difference between “someone had a quick look” and a service with a standard, metrics and accountability.

Yes, and it's increasingly common: ISO 18587-certified linguistic validation of what your AI produces. You keep the speed and cost of your own process, and get external quality control (with a standard and metrics) before publishing.